by Dan Clayton, SLR Consulting Ltd.
Over 80
acoustics practitioners came together for the 2022 Fall AANViS conference, Sounding
Alarms, Solving Problems.
It was
great to see so many faces at the conference. There was so much buzz and energy
in the rooms before the conference started. The coffee was at the ready and
there was a sense of anticipation for the first time the industry had met up en
masse since the pandemic.
The day
kicked off with lots of people arriving in time for registration, buffet breakfast,
and networking before the opening speech from Richard Patching, AANViS
President.
Opening
Plenary. Richard’s
speech first acknowledged the many First Nations, Métis, and Inuit
who cared for the traditional territories and lands which were being used for
the conference that day. This acknowledgement was made as an act of
reconciliation and gratitude to those whose territory we reside on or are
visiting.
The
conference sponsors were key to keeping the costs for attendees down. Richard
thanked all the sponsors, including our Platinum sponsors, Motion Canada and Wallworks,
Gold Sponsors, RWDI and SLR Consulting, and Silver Sponsors, AP dynamics, Behrens
& Associates Environmental Noise Control, Merlin Integrated Services, NTi
Audio, Patching Associates Acoustical Engineering and X-Scala.
Richard
reflected on the challenging decision to postpone the original date of this
conference from 2020 due to COVID. It was the right decision to make. The
timing felt right to hold it in the fall of 2022, and the crowd of people there
really showed support for wanting to get back together and get things moving
again.
Richard
closed off by welcoming everyone to the first of many AANViS conferences, with
a hint at a longer duration one in the future (looking at spring 2024, watch
this space).
The morning
sessions had the conference split into two spaces: one a half-day workshop and
the other a series of expert panels at the mercy of a keen audience to ask
questions on an array of topics.
Introduction
to Acoustics. Steve
Bilawchuk provided his insightful “Introduction to Acoustics Workshop” to an
eager audience of keen “students.” Steve walked the audience through the
concepts of acoustics, with all sorts of sounds being played to demonstrate the
points. The seminar helped to develop and enhance the participants’ knowledge
of concepts and principles in Acoustics, providing an opportunity to apply
theory to practical situations about sound sources and their control.
Why
consultants cost so much…or do they? Dan Clayton of SLR Consulting Ltd., James
Farquharson of FDI Acoustics Inc., and Jonathan Chui of Stantec were on the
panel of experts. This was an interesting Q&A session with some honest and
thought-provoking answers. A few highlights were a discussion around equipment
charges to clients, what the panel has seen as changes in technology over the
years, how to manage scope creep, and field measurements and analysis
processes.
Defining
the problem. Ian
Bonsma of HGC Engineering, Jessie Roy of RWDI, and Pascal Everton of Soft dB
gave opinions and answered questions on “Defining the Problem (RFP
Requirements).” This session was targeted at individuals who develop RFPs and
the challenges consultants face when trying to respond to them. There were some
interesting points made about how difficult it often is for consultants to
interpret RFPs for what the client needs and the inefficiencies around this
process while being balanced with seeking a competitive bidding process,
especially where public money is involved. There was also some discussion about
the general RFP culture that is now integral to many procurement processes and
how it can seem to be cost-advantageous but is becoming more of a competition
of who can write the lowest bid with the tightest scope (having lots of
caveats), knowing that soon enough scope change will be inevitable. Things
wrapped up with some thoughts and suggestions around RFP issuers seeking
support from the acoustics industry on how to relay the problem to be
solved/scope clearly and posed the idea of having an interview stage in the
selection process.
What
didn’t work and why?
Andy Strasser of Merlin Integrated
Solutions, Cliff Faszer of FFA Consultants in Acoustics and Noise Control, and
Richard Patching, AANViS President, were on the panel to reflect on the
ineffective choices in the design and construction of solutions for sound and
vibration issues, along with solutions that worked. There were many historical
projects shared by the panel and some fantastic questions to get to some real
nitty-gritty details on what went wrong. A masterclass from the experts with some
great insight in the session.
Lunchtime
keynote. Prior to
his move to Canada, Dan Clayton completed an undergraduate degree and worked
for eleven years in the UK. This recent experience with the profession of
acoustics in two countries gives Dan a unique perspective on the similarities
and differences in the way the profession is practised, regulated and
supported. Click here for a more complete description of Dan’s observations on the
differences, how the UK developed its approach and some ideas that could
improve the industry here in Canada.
Dan’s talk
got everyone talking in the networking space about what they could do next to
help with the big tasks ahead and the challenges they are facing. It was great
to see everyone so passionate about what could be done.
The
afternoon sessions split into two rooms again.
Noise
regulations. Five
key personnel formed part of the panels of this half-day session talking about upcoming
changes to and expectations around assessment approaches. There was
representation from four major decision-makers and stakeholders in Alberta.
These were the Alberta Utilities Commission (AUC), Alberta Energy Regulator
(AER), Alberta Infrastructure, and City of Calgary Transportation Planning.
First off,
Joan You (AUC) and Jason Cao (AER) went through some expectations for Noise
Impact Assessments (NIAs) submitted to each regulator. After this, the floor opened
to questions from the audience.
The
requirement for NIAs to be stamped by professional engineers came up. On this, the
AUC said this wasn’t a requirement but the AER said it was. There was some
confusion in the room around this, especially for practitioners without this
classification and how it may be seen as an overly bureaucratic requirement,
especially where it may not reflect on competency for completing a technically
satisfactory NIA.
They were
asked if there was any in-person consultation planned for the upcoming updates
to the regulations. The AER stated that they understood that their attendance
at this conference would suffice as consultation, which surprised the room. A
comment regarding the mix of wind farm assessment in AUC Rule 012 with the rest
seems inappropriate and should be split into a separate document, with
reference made to the IoA good practice guide. The AUC said that this may not
be a bad idea and would consider this going forward.
The next panelists
were Heather Leonhardt and Vedran Vavan from the City of Calgary Transportation
Planning. The first thing mentioned was how the department now had an acoustics
specialist, Vedran, to help with the more technical side of sound in
transportation planning. There were lots of questions about the general plan
for managing sound from transportation and especially in the general reduction
strategy for the city. There were discussions around the benefit of a city-wide
noise map.
Finally,
Phillip Wloka presented some key elements that form part of the requirements
for design under Alberta Infrastructure, with a focus on building design.
Phillip gave a great introduction to the requirements and stated some general
rules of thumb on their expectations. A notable mention was that Alberta
Infrastructure is exploring IIC requirements for future iterations of its
Technical Design Requirements (TDR). He also noted that if an acoustics
consultant is onboard, he is generally happy and trusts their judgment. He also
reflected on what it was like going from working in the private acoustics
industry to working for Alberta Infrastructure, which was very insightful.
How to
become a good consultant. Corjan Buma, MEANU at the University of Alberta, Justin Caskey of
Patching Associates, and Teresa Drew of RWDI provided great insight and
experiences on how to excel in this challenging industry, not from just a
technical perspective but developing internal projects and resources to help
deliver the best possible product to clients while managing the concerns and
challenges of running a company.
Paper
presentations. The technical
part of the day closed off with a variety of technical presentations from the
old pros and their new techniques and innovations. These presentations ranged
from localizing low-frequency sound sources, temporary acoustic barriers, and
innovative approaches to acoustical design and relaying the process to clients
or end users through simulation.
Book
launch & reception. The final part of the conference was the reception over a few light
snacks and the launch of Dr. Marcia Jenneth Epstein's book, Sound and Noise:
A Listener's Guide to Everyday Life. It’s a fantastic read if you haven’t
had a chance to read it. All the copies brought to the conference were sold to
the crowd of attendees.
AANViS
would like to thank all attendees of the Sounding Alarms Solving Problems
conference in November 2022. We couldn’t have done it without your support and
participation.
Keep your
eyes peeled for news about the 2024 conference soon.